A Comprehensive Examination of the Pradyuman Dixit and Poonam Dixit Corruption Scandal: OrionPro Solutions, Treegen Software Limited, and RajComp Info Services in Rajasthan

In October 2025, a major corruption scandal emerged in Rajasthan’s Department of Information Technology and Communication (DoIT&C) that has exposed systematic abuse of official position, fraudulent employment practices, and the manipulation of government tender processes. At the center of this controversy are Pradyuman Dixit, a Joint Director at RajComp Info Services Limited, and his wife Poonam Dixit, along with two private companies—OrionPro Solutions and Treegen Software Limited. The case, currently under investigation by the Rajasthan Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB), reveals how a government official allegedly orchestrated a scheme resulting in illegal payments exceeding Rs 37.54 lakh to his wife through fabricated employment arrangements spanning 21 months.[1][2][3][4]

Background: The Key Players and Institutions

RajComp Info Services Limited (RISL)

RajComp Info Services Limited, commonly known as RISL, is a fully owned Government of Rajasthan undertaking incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 on October 27, 2010. Operating under the aegis of the state government, RISL serves as the State Designated Agency (SDA) for implementing projects under the National e-Governance Plan (NeGP), including critical infrastructure such as the State Data Centre (SDC), State Wide Area Network (SWAN), Common Service Centers, e-District initiatives, and e-Procurement systems. The organization’s primary expertise encompasses IT consultancy, e-Governance project conceptualization and implementation, capacity building in the IT domain, provision of customized IT solutions spanning both hardware and software projects, GIS development, and multimedia development.[5][6]

RISL has been instrumental in numerous high-profile government digitization projects, including the development of portals such as JanSoochna, Rajasthan Sampark, and various smart city initiatives. The organization operates from its headquarters located at the 1st Floor, C-Block, Yojana Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur-302005. Given its pivotal role in managing government IT contracts and tenders worth hundreds of crores, RISL officials wield considerable influence over which private companies receive lucrative government projects.[7][8][9][10][11][5]

Pradyuman Dixit: The Accused Official

Pradyuman Dixit served as a Joint Director in the Department of Information Technology at RajComp Info Services Limited during the period when the alleged corruption took place (2019-2020). In this capacity, he held significant authority over the evaluation, recommendation, and approval of government IT tenders and contracts. Joint Directors at RISL are senior-level officials responsible for overseeing major technology implementation projects, vendor selection processes, and ensuring compliance with government procurement regulations.[1][2][3][4][12][13]

According to the ACB investigation, Dixit was posted as the Joint Director of the Data Centre when the alleged crimes occurred. His position afforded him the authority to influence tender allocations, approve vendor performance reports, and verify employee attendance records for companies working on government contracts. The investigation revealed that Dixit allegedly exploited these official powers to favor specific private companies that subsequently employed his wife under questionable circumstances.[2][3][4][1]

Poonam Dixit: The Alleged Beneficiary

Poonam Dixit (also referred to as Poonam Pandey in some documents) is the wife of Pradyuman Dixit. The ACB investigation found that between January 2019 and September 2020, she was simultaneously listed as an employee of two separate private IT companies—OrionPro Solutions and Treegen Software Limited—despite never actually working at either organization.[1][14][2][3][4][12][15]

During this 21-month period, Poonam Dixit allegedly received regular monthly salary payments totaling Rs 37,54,405, which were deposited into five different personal bank accounts she maintained. Investigators determined that she never visited either company’s offices, never attended duty, and never performed any actual work for these employers. The payments were formally recorded as legitimate salary disbursements, with one company showing her as a regular employee while the other classified her engagement as “freelancing”.[14][2][3][4][16][17][1]

Most remarkably, the investigation revealed that Pradyuman Dixit himself approved his wife’s attendance reports and performance evaluations for both companies, creating a closed loop of fraudulent documentation. This arrangement allegedly served as a mechanism for channeling bribes to the Joint Director in exchange for favorable treatment in the government tender allocation process.[3][4][17]

The Two Private Companies: OrionPro Solutions and Treegen Software Limited

The two companies at the center of this scandal—OrionPro Solutions and Treegen Software Limited—were both recipients of government tenders from the Rajasthan Department of Information Technology during the period when Poonam Dixit was falsely listed on their payrolls.[1][2][4][12][16]

It is important to note a critical distinction regarding one of these companies: The “OrionPro Solutions” mentioned in the corruption case should not be confused with Aurionpro Solutions Limited, a legitimate publicly-traded technology company (BSE: 532668; NSE: AURIONPRO) headquartered in Navi Mumbai. Aurionpro Solutions is a well-established enterprise technology firm founded in 1997, with over 2,700 employees and operations in 22 countries, providing banking, payments, transit, and government sector solutions.[18][19][20][21]

Aurionpro Solutions has indeed worked with the Government of Rajasthan on legitimate projects, most notably winning a Rs 180 crore contract in 2018 (with an additional Rs 25 crore expansion in 2022) to develop the nation’s first “3D City” model for Jaipur, creating a digital twin of the city for urban planning purposes. However, there is no evidence connecting this reputable company to the corruption scandal involving the Dixits. The “OrionPro Solutions” implicated in the fake employment scheme appears to be a separate, distinct entity, though details about its corporate structure and legitimacy remain unclear in available public records.[22][23][9][24][25][18]

Similarly, Treegen Software Limited mentioned in the ACB investigation appears to be distinct from other companies with similar names. One such company is Trigen Software Solutions Ltd (Company number 08435724), a UK-registered private limited company incorporated on March 8, 2013, engaged in information technology consultancy activities. There is also TreeGen, an environmental consulting firm focused on forestry management and climate technology, providing digital platforms for forest carbon sequestration verification. However, neither of these entities appears to be the “Treegen Software Limited” referenced in the Rajasthan corruption case.[26][27][28][29][30]

The lack of comprehensive public information about the exact corporate identities of the two companies involved in the scandal suggests they may be smaller IT firms or potentially shell companies established specifically to participate in government procurement processes. Both companies allegedly made regular payments to Poonam Dixit’s bank accounts between January 2019 and September 2020 while simultaneously receiving government contracts through RajComp Info Services.[2][4][16][1]

The Corruption Scheme: Modus Operandi and Timeline

The Alleged Arrangement (January 2019 – September 2020)

According to the ACB investigation, the corruption scheme operated through a straightforward but audacious mechanism:[1][2][4]

  1. Tender Manipulation: Pradyuman Dixit allegedly used his official position as Joint Director at RajComp Info Services to ensure that OrionPro Solutions and Treegen Software Limited were awarded government IT tenders. Given his senior position in the organization responsible for evaluating and allocating such contracts, Dixit had significant influence over which companies received lucrative government projects.[2][3][4][16]
  2. Quid Pro Quo Employment: In return for favorable tender decisions, Dixit allegedly directed both companies to employ his wife, Poonam Dixit, and provide her with regular monthly salary payments. This arrangement effectively functioned as a mechanism for channeling bribes to the government official through his spouse.[3][4][1][2]
  3. Fabricated Documentation: Despite Poonam Dixit never actually working for either company, elaborate documentation was created to make the employment appear legitimate. This included:
    1. Formal employment contracts
    1. Monthly salary payment records
    1. Attendance reports (which Pradyuman Dixit himself approved)[4][17]
    1. Performance evaluations
  4. Dual Employment: In a particularly brazen aspect of the scheme, Poonam Dixit was simultaneously listed as an employee of OrionPro Solutions while also receiving payments from Treegen Software Limited under the guise of “freelancing”. This dual arrangement allowed for the transfer of even larger sums without raising immediate suspicion.[17][4]
  5. Multiple Bank Accounts: To further obscure the money trail, the payments were distributed across five different personal bank accounts maintained by Poonam Dixit. Between January 2019 and September 2020, these accounts received a total of Rs 37,54,405 in transfers from the two companies, all formally recorded as salary payments.[16][2][4]
  6. Zero Physical Presence: Throughout the entire 21-month period, Poonam Dixit never visited either company’s offices, never reported for duty, and never performed any actual work. This complete absence of physical presence or work output makes it clear that the employment was entirely fictitious.[14][1][3][4]

The Financial Impact

The total amount involved in the scandal is Rs 37,54,405 (approximately Rs 37.5 lakh or $45,000 USD), transferred to Poonam Dixit’s five bank accounts over 21 months. This represents an average monthly payment of approximately Rs 1.79 lakh (about $2,150 USD), a substantial sum that far exceeds typical salaries for IT professionals in India during that period.[14][2][4][16][15]

The ACB investigation categorized these payments as bribes disguised as wages for official favors in the allocation and clearance of government IT contracts. The actual value of the government tenders that OrionPro Solutions and Treegen Software Limited received during this period has not been publicly disclosed, but it likely amounts to several crores of rupees, making the Rs 37.5 lakh in payments to Poonam Dixit a relatively small percentage of the overall contract values—essentially a commission on the larger deals.[1][2][3]

Discovery and Investigation

The High Court Petition (September 6, 2024)

The entire scandal came to light through a petition filed in the Rajasthan High Court by an unidentified complainant. On September 6, 2024, the High Court issued an order directing the Anti-Corruption Bureau to investigate the allegations of corruption and abuse of official position. This judicial intervention proved crucial in initiating what would become a comprehensive investigation into tender irregularities within the Department of Information Technology.[1][2][4][17]

ACB Preliminary Inquiry (July 3, 2025)

Following the High Court’s directive, the ACB launched a preliminary inquiry on July 3, 2025. The investigation focused on examining:[2][4][17]

  • Bank transaction records across Poonam Dixit’s five accounts
  • Tender allocation processes and decision-making records at RajComp Info Services
  • Employment documentation from OrionPro Solutions and Treegen Software Limited
  • Attendance and performance evaluation records
  • The role of other officials, including Rakesh Kumar Kamlesh, who was also named in the FIR[3]

The ACB investigation uncovered that Pradyuman Dixit had personally approved his wife’s fake attendance reports for both companies. This discovery was particularly damaging, as it demonstrated the Joint Director’s direct involvement in creating fraudulent documentation to support the illegal scheme. The investigation also revealed that the two companies had continued to receive government tenders throughout the period when they were making payments to Poonam Dixit.[4][17]

FIR Registration and Charges (October 2025)

In October 2025, the ACB formally registered an FIR (First Information Report) against multiple individuals involved in the corruption scheme. The FIR names:[3]

  1. Pradyuman Dixit – Joint Director, RajComp Info Services Limited
  2. Rakesh Kumar Kamlesh – Another employee (role not clearly specified in available reports)
  3. Poonam Dixit – Wife of Pradyuman Dixit and alleged beneficiary
  4. Others – Potentially including representatives from OrionPro Solutions and Treegen Software Limited

The charges filed against the accused include provisions under:

  • The Prevention of Corruption Act – For misuse of official position, acceptance of illegal gratification, and criminal misconduct by a public servant[3]
  • The Indian Penal Code (IPC) – For criminal conspiracy to defraud the government[3]

The ACB stated that the allegations center on Pradyuman Dixit misusing his position to secure work for two private companies in exchange for showing his wife as an employee and depositing monthly salaries into her accounts despite her never working for them. The investigation characterized the payments as bribes disguised as wages for official favors.[3]

Broader Context: IT Department Corruption in Rajasthan

The Pradyuman Dixit case is not an isolated incident but rather part of a broader pattern of corruption allegations that have plagued Rajasthan’s Department of Information Technology and Communication in recent years.

The Ved Prakash Yadav Case (May 2023)

Perhaps the most sensational precursor to the Dixit scandal was the case of Ved Prakash Yadav, another Joint Director in the DoIT&C. In May 2023, during routine file scanning work at the UID Branch of DoIT&C, authorities discovered two bags in an office almirah filled with Rs 2.31 crore in cash (in denominations of Rs 500 and Rs 2,000) and a one-kilogram gold bar valued at Rs 61.80 lakh—all allegedly belonging to Yadav.[31][32][33][34]

The ACB filed charges against Yadav for acquiring disproportionate assets to the tune of Rs 3.35 crore during the period from March 31, 1994, to May 21, 2023. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) subsequently arrested Yadav on August 9, 2023, on money laundering charges. Searches conducted by the ED at 17 locations in Jaipur, Delhi, Mumbai, and Udaipur led to seizures of 5.3 kg of gold worth Rs 3.21 crore, along with sale deeds of properties and incriminating documents.[32][33][35][36][34][31]

Yadav was reportedly a member of the purchase committee for IT equipment procurement, raising questions about potential kickbacks from vendors. Although he received bail from the ACB, the Rajasthan High Court denied him bail in the ED case, with Justice Praveer Bhatnagar noting that the large amount of cash and gold seized from the public servant justified continued detention.[37][36]

Allegations of Large-Scale IT Department Scam

In June 2023, BJP Rajya Sabha MP Kirodi Lal Meena made explosive allegations of a Rs 5,000 crore scam in Rajasthan’s Department of Information Technology and Communication. Meena claimed that senior official Rajesh Saini, believed to be close to then-Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot, was leading the alleged scam. The allegations included:[38][39]

  • Purchases made at inflated rates
  • Exorbitant travel allowances given to officials (more than Rs 2 lakh per day for travel within Rajasthan and exceeding Rs 4 lakh per day for travel outside the state)[38]
  • Corruption involving RajCOMP, National Informatics Centre Services Inc., and IT officials who allegedly “looted money worth crores of rupees”[38]

BJP leaders, including Leader of Opposition Rajendra Rathore, state chief CP Joshi, and MP Kirori Lal Meena, demanded CBI and ED probes into what they characterized as a Rs 3,500 crore scam in IT procurement through RajCOMP Info Services Ltd. They pointed to the government’s allocation of 5% of its budget to IT projects—including distributing smartphones to 1.35 crore women and purchasing drones—as potential sources of corruption.[37]

ACB Special Investigation Team (October 2024)

In compliance with a Rajasthan High Court order, the ACB formed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) in October 2024 to examine all tenders issued by the Department of Information Technology over the past five years, coinciding with the tenure of the Ashok Gehlot-led Congress government. The SIT, comprising five senior ACB officers, was tasked with investigating “procedures, involvement, and irregularities” in the tender process. The High Court directed that no one involved in corruption should be spared and ordered the ACB to submit a detailed report.[40]

This broader investigation into the IT department’s tendering process provided the framework within which the Pradyuman Dixit case would later be examined, suggesting systemic issues rather than isolated incidents of corruption.

Legal Proceedings and Current Status

Charges and Legal Framework

The case against Pradyuman Dixit, Poonam Dixit, Rakesh Kumar Kamlesh, and others proceeds under two primary legal frameworks:

  1. Prevention of Corruption Act: This Act specifically addresses corruption by public servants and includes provisions for:
    1. Criminal misconduct by a public servant (Section 13)
    1. Acceptance or obtaining illegal gratification (Section 7)
    1. Misuse of official position to confer undue advantage (Section 13(1)(d))
    1. Possession of disproportionate assets[3]
  2. Indian Penal Code (IPC): The criminal conspiracy charges under the IPC address the coordinated nature of the fraud, involving multiple parties working together to defraud the government.[3]

The ACB’s FIR characterizes the scheme as follows: Pradyuman Dixit allegedly misused his official position to secure government work for OrionPro Solutions and Treegen Software Limited, and in return, these companies falsely showed his wife as an employee and deposited regular monthly salaries into her accounts despite her never working for them. The payments are classified as bribes disguised as wages for official favors in the allocation and clearance of government IT contracts.[3]

Investigation Status

As of October 2025, the investigation remains active. The ACB has appointed a senior police officer to conduct a thorough probe into the matter. Key aspects of the ongoing investigation include:[3]

  1. Verification of Attendance Records: Investigators are examining whether Pradyuman Dixit personally verified his wife’s attendance and approved her performance reports, which the preliminary investigation suggests he did.[4][3]
  2. Document Authenticity: The ACB is scrutinizing all related documents to verify their authenticity, including employment contracts, payment records, and performance evaluations.[3]
  3. Tender Process Examination: Investigators are reviewing the tender allocation processes to determine exactly how Pradyuman Dixit influenced the awarding of contracts to the two companies.[2][3]
  4. Financial Trail Analysis: The investigation continues to trace the flow of funds across the five bank accounts that received the Rs 37.54 lakh in payments.[2][4]
  5. Identification of Additional Conspirators: The FIR includes “others” beyond the three named individuals, suggesting the investigation may expand to include company representatives and potentially other government officials.[3]

Potential Consequences

If convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, the accused could face:

  • Imprisonment: The Act provides for imprisonment ranging from six months to seven years, depending on the specific offense
  • Fines: Courts can impose substantial financial penalties in addition to imprisonment
  • Disqualification from Public Service: Conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act typically results in permanent disqualification from holding any public office
  • Recovery of Illegal Gains: Courts may order the recovery and confiscation of all illegal payments and assets acquired through corrupt means

For Poonam Dixit, charges related to abetment and conspiracy could result in similar penalties, as the law treats co-conspirators in corruption schemes with equal severity.

Comparison with Similar Cases

The Pradyuman Dixit case bears similarities to other corruption cases involving fictitious employment as a bribery mechanism. In 2017, the Rajasthan High Court dealt with a case involving placement agencies and fake appointments in the health department, where a Dr. Poonam Garg (not to be confused with Poonam Dixit) challenged her termination after being appointed through questionable means. The court in that case emphasized that even contractual appointments must follow minimum selection procedures and that backdoor entries without any basis or process violate constitutional mandates.[41]

The broader principle established in Indian jurisprudence is that public employment, whether contractual or permanent, must be conducted through transparent, merit-based processes following Article 14 and Article 16 of the Constitution of India. Any appointment that circumvents these principles—especially when connected to tender allocations—constitutes a serious breach of public trust.[41]

Systemic Issues and Implications

Procurement and Tender Vulnerabilities

The Pradyuman Dixit case highlights several systemic vulnerabilities in the government IT procurement process:

  1. Concentration of Authority: Joint Directors at RajComp Info Services wield considerable power over tender evaluations and contract awards, creating opportunities for abuse when proper checks and balances are absent.[2][3]
  2. Lack of Independent Oversight: The fact that Pradyuman Dixit could personally approve his wife’s attendance and performance reports for companies receiving government contracts suggests insufficient separation of duties and inadequate oversight mechanisms.[3][4]
  3. Vendor Verification Gaps: The ability of companies to maintain employees on their payrolls who never report for work indicates weaknesses in vendor compliance monitoring and verification processes.[1][3]
  4. Conflict of Interest Reporting: The case raises questions about whether adequate systems exist for government officials to declare potential conflicts of interest, such as family members’ employment with government contractors.

Impact on Public Trust

Corruption scandals in IT departments are particularly damaging because these departments manage the digital infrastructure critical to e-governance initiatives. When citizens lose confidence in the integrity of the systems managing their data and delivering government services, it undermines the entire digital governance project.[5][6]

The Rajasthan IT department oversees numerous high-impact initiatives including:

  • Jan Aadhaar identity system
  • E-Mitra service delivery platforms
  • State Data Centre managing sensitive government and citizen data
  • E-procurement systems handling thousands of crores in government contracts[10][5]

Corruption in such a critical department not only results in direct financial losses but also jeopardizes the security, efficiency, and trustworthiness of these essential digital public goods.

Economic Costs

Beyond the Rs 37.54 lakh directly paid to Poonam Dixit, the broader economic costs of such corruption are substantial:

  1. Inefficient Resource Allocation: When contracts are awarded based on kickbacks rather than merit, the government does not receive the best value for its expenditure.[2][3]
  2. Deterrence of Legitimate Vendors: Honest companies may be discouraged from bidding for government contracts if they perceive the process as rigged in favor of those willing to pay bribes.
  3. Reduced Service Quality: Projects awarded through corrupt processes often result in substandard implementation, as the vendor’s focus shifts from delivering quality to maximizing profits after accounting for bribe payments.
  4. Investigation and Prosecution Costs: The resources required for ACB investigations, court proceedings, and potential asset recovery represent additional public expenditure resulting from corruption.[40][42]

Political Ramifications

The timing of these corruption revelations has significant political implications for Rajasthan. The scandals emerged during and after the tenure of the Ashok Gehlot-led Congress government, which held power in the state until December 2023. The BJP opposition vigorously used these corruption allegations as campaign issues, demanding CBI and ED investigations and organizing protests.[40][38][37]

The formation of the ACB’s Special Investigation Team to examine five years of IT department tenders—essentially covering the Congress government’s entire tenure—suggests that the investigation has both legal and political dimensions. The High Court’s directive to ensure that “no one involved in the corruption is spared” places additional pressure on investigative agencies to conduct thorough probes regardless of political connections.[40]

Organizational Responses and Reform Efforts

RajComp Info Services Internal Measures

While specific internal reforms at RajComp Info Services have not been detailed in public reports, the organization would typically be expected to implement measures such as:

  1. Strengthened Conflict of Interest Policies: Requiring all officials involved in tender evaluation to declare any family connections to potential vendors
  2. Enhanced Vendor Compliance Monitoring: Regular audits of vendor employee records and verification of actual work performed
  3. Rotation of Responsibilities: Rotating officials through different positions to prevent the development of corrupt relationships with specific vendors
  4. Independent Review Committees: Establishing independent panels to review high-value contract awards
  5. Whistleblower Protection: Creating secure channels for employees to report suspected corruption without fear of retaliation

Government of Rajasthan Initiatives

The broader ACB investigation into IT department tender processes represents a systemic response to the corruption allegations. The five-year review ordered by the Rajasthan High Court should result in:[40]

  • Identification of patterns of favoritism in contract awards
  • Development of improved procurement guidelines
  • Enhanced transparency measures in the tender process
  • Potential prosecution of additional individuals involved in corrupt practices

The ACB, functioning under the Rajasthan Police since its establishment in 1949 and reorganized as a separate Anti-Corruption Branch in 1957, has been tasked with conducting inquiries into complaints of corruption and investigating cases registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The bureau deals with four types of cases: Trap Cases, Disproportionate Assets Cases, Embezzlement Cases, and Misuse of Office Cases. The Pradyuman Dixit case falls primarily under the Misuse of Office category, with elements of embezzlement through the diversion of public funds.[42][43][44]

Technology-Enabled Transparency

One positive development in Rajasthan’s anti-corruption efforts has been the ACB’s embrace of digital technology. The ACB website (https://acb.rajasthan.gov.in) features:[42]

  • An online complaint portal allowing citizens to file complaints anonymously
  • Case tracking integration with the eCourts platform for real-time status updates
  • Publication of five-year statistics on registered cases
  • WhatsApp helpline for citizen accessibility[42]

These technological advancements position the ACB as a leader in modern anti-corruption strategies, though the emergence of cases like the Dixit scandal indicates that enforcement mechanisms must continually evolve to keep pace with increasingly sophisticated corruption techniques.

Broader Context: IT Sector Governance Challenges

The Public-Private Interface in Government IT Projects

The Pradyuman Dixit case exemplifies the challenges at the intersection of public administration and private sector IT service delivery. Governments worldwide increasingly rely on private companies to design, develop, and maintain complex IT systems. This dependency creates inherent risks:[5][9]

  1. Information Asymmetry: Government officials often lack the technical expertise to fully evaluate IT proposals, making them dependent on the very vendors they are meant to oversee
  2. Relationship Development: Long-term projects create relationships between officials and vendors that can evolve from professional to corrupt
  3. Revolving Door: Officials involved in awarding contracts may later seek employment with the companies they previously contracted, creating conflicts of interest
  4. Complexity as Cover: The technical complexity of IT projects can obscure inflated costs and substandard performance from public scrutiny

Lessons from International Best Practices

International experiences with government IT procurement suggest several best practices that could help prevent cases like the Dixit scandal:

  1. Open Contracting: Publishing all tender documents, bids, and contract awards in machine-readable formats for public scrutiny
  2. Beneficial Ownership Disclosure: Requiring companies bidding for government contracts to disclose their ultimate beneficial owners to identify potential conflicts of interest
  3. E-Procurement with Audit Trails: Implementing fully digital procurement systems that create immutable audit trails of all decisions
  4. Third-Party Technical Evaluation: Engaging independent technical experts to evaluate complex IT proposals rather than relying solely on internal staff
  5. Contract Performance Monitoring: Establishing dedicated units to monitor contract implementation and verify deliverables

Conclusion: Justice, Reform, and Accountability

The corruption scandal involving Pradyuman Dixit, Poonam Dixit, OrionPro Solutions, and Treegen Software Limited represents a significant breach of public trust in Rajasthan’s information technology governance framework. The allegations that a Joint Director at RajComp Info Services manipulated the government tender process to channel Rs 37.54 lakh to his wife through fictitious employment arrangements over 21 months demonstrates a calculated and systematic abuse of official position.[1][2][3][4]

The case underscores the critical importance of robust oversight mechanisms, conflict of interest management, and transparent procurement processes in government IT departments. The role of the Rajasthan High Court in ordering the investigation and the ACB’s thorough preliminary inquiry demonstrate that institutional checks and balances can function effectively when activated. However, the fact that the scheme operated undetected for nearly two years suggests that preventive mechanisms require strengthening.[2][4][40][1]

As the investigation continues and legal proceedings advance, several key questions remain:

  1. What was the total value of government contracts awarded to OrionPro Solutions and Treegen Software Limited during the period of the alleged corruption?
  2. Were there other officials at RajComp Info Services or DoIT&C complicit in the scheme?
  3. Did the two companies fulfill their contractual obligations adequately, or did the corrupt arrangements also compromise project quality?
  4. Are there other similar cases of fictitious employment being used as a bribery mechanism in Rajasthan’s IT sector?

The answers to these questions will emerge through the ongoing ACB investigation and subsequent legal proceedings. For now, the case serves as a stark reminder that even in the digital age—or perhaps especially in the digital age—vigilance, transparency, and accountability remain the essential foundations of good governance. The citizens of Rajasthan, who depend on efficient and honest administration of government IT services, deserve nothing less than a complete investigation and appropriate punishment for those found guilty of betraying the public trust.[3][5][6]

The broader lesson extends beyond Rajasthan to all jurisdictions grappling with the governance challenges of digital transformation: technological modernization must be accompanied by equally modern systems of oversight, transparency, and accountability. Only then can the promise of e-governance—efficient, transparent, and citizen-centric public services—be fully realized.[5][42][43]

  1. https://www.zoomnews.in/en/news-detail/rajcomp-joint-director-accused-of-securing-rs-3754-lakh-for-wife-through-paper-jobs-in-two-companies.html              
  2. https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/city/how-a-rajasthan-officer-s-wife-earned-rs-37-lakh-salary-for-jobs-she-never-did-13633454.html                    
  3. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/it-dept-officer-pays-salaries-towife-for-fake-jobs-acb-files-fir/articleshow/124834043.cms                            
  4. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/rajasthan-officers-wife-earns-rs-37-54-lakh-salary-from-2-firms-without-working-9520788                       
  5. https://risl.rajasthan.gov.in/AboutUs      
  6. https://risl.rajasthan.gov.in  
  7. https://cca.gov.in/rajcomp.html
  8. https://rajsims.rajasthan.gov.in/ContactUs
  9. https://www.expresscomputer.in/news/jaipur-will-get-its-own-3d-model-by-mid-2020-read-how-rajasthan-govt-is-driving-this-unique-project/31692/  
  10. https://risl.rajasthan.gov.in/ListofProjects 
  11. https://www.scribd.com/document/824197766/Government-Services-System-in-Rajasthan
  12. https://www.news18.com/india/rajasthan-govt-officer-fakes-wifes-job-at-2-firms-she-earns-rs-37-lakh-without-working-ws-kl-9660158.html  
  13. https://risl.rajasthan.gov.in/Team
  14. https://hindi.news18.com/news/rajasthan/jaipur-rajasthan-it-department-scam-37-lakh-salary-fraud-officers-pradyuman-dixit-wife-poonam-fake-job-jaipur-news-ws-ekl-9781735.html   
  15. https://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/state/rajasthan/jaipur/doit-officer-pradyuman-dixit-wife-salary-fraud-rs-1-lakh-60-thousand-per-month-without-attending-duty/articleshow/124824971.cms 
  16. https://www.moneycontrol.com/city/how-a-rajasthan-officer-s-wife-earned-rs-37-lakh-salary-for-jobs-she-never-did-article-13633454.html     
  17. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/rajasthan-officers-wife-earns-rs-37-54-lakh-salary-from-2-firms-without-working-9520788/amp/1      
  18. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurionpro 
  19. https://www.aurionpro.com
  20. https://in.linkedin.com/company/aurionpro-solutions
  21. https://www.screener.in/company/AURIONPRO/consolidated/
  22. https://www.business-standard.com/amp/article/news-cm/aurionpro-solutions-rises-on-order-win-from-govt-of-rajasthan-122062400399_1.html
  23. https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/aurionpro-bags-over-rs-180-cr-3d-city-project-from-rajasthan-govt-118032200925_1.html
  24. https://www.indiainfoline.com/news/markets/aurionpro-wins-order-from-rajasthan-govt-to-further-expand-3d-city-platform-in-jaipur
  25. https://www.varindia.com/news/aurionpro-wins-rajasthan-governments-smart-city-initiative–3d-city
  26. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/08435724
  27. https://www.treegen-s.com
  28. https://treegen.co/who-we-are/
  29. https://treegen.co
  30. https://www.treegen-s.com/our-technology
  31. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/rajasthan-ex-bureaucrat-held-for-money-laundering-535192/ 
  32. https://www.ndtv.com/jaipur-news/ex-rajasthan-official-arrested-by-probe-agency-in-money-laundering-case-4296412 
  33. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/rajasthan/ed-arrests-former-rajasthan-joint-director-in-da-linked-money-laundering-case-2646764 
  34. https://enforcementdirectorate.gov.in/sites/default/files/latestnews/Press Release-Ved Prakash Yadav-14.08.2023.pdf 
  35. https://www.dailypioneer.com/2023/india/ed-arrests-ex-joint-director-of-rajasthan—s-it-dept-on-money-laundering-charges.html
  36. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/hc-denies-bail-to-axed-doit-babu-in-money-laundering-case/articleshow/111010167.cms 
  37. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/govt-orchestrated-rs-3500-crore-scam-in-it-dept-cbi-probe-needed-bjp/articleshow/100459270.cms  
  38. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/rajasthan-it-department-scam-bjp-ashok-gehlot-rs-5000-crore-corruption-2389662-2023-06-06   
  39. https://www.thestatesman.com/india/plaint-filed-with-ed-over-alleged-scam-in-rajasthans-doit-1503188194.html
  40. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/acb-launches-sit-to-investigate-doit-tender-corruption-in-rajasthan/articleshow/113864729.cms     
  41. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5ae10c889eff43715bae7d04 
  42. https://acb.rajasthan.work    
  43. https://www.india.gov.in/official-website-anti-corruption-bureau-rajasthan 
  44. https://www.rajasthandirect.com/government-departments/anti-corruption-bureau-rajasthan
  45. https://www.myupchar.com/en/doctors/nagpur/congress-nagar/ayurveda/dr-poonam-dixit-40893
  46. https://www.aajkaal.in/story/64943/rajasthan-officers-wife-pradyuman-dixit-earns-rs-over-37-lakh-salary-from-two-firms-without-working
  47. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kC1vCM_Ep8c
  48. https://www.moneycontrol.com/india/stockpricequote/computers-software-mediumsmall/aurionprosolutions/PS12
  49. https://inshorts.com/en/news/rajasthan-officer-s-wife-earns–37-5-lakh–salary–from-2-firms-without-working-1761528601957
  50. https://inshorts.com/en/amp_news/rajasthan-officer-s-wife-earns–37-5-lakh–salary–from-2-firms-without-working-1761528601957
  51. https://in.linkedin.com/in/dr-poonam-dixit-7b9b981b2
  52. https://in.linkedin.com/company/rajcomp-info-services-ltd
  53. https://treegen-3d-tree-generator.soft112.com
  54. https://groww.in/stocks/aurionpro-solutions-ltd
  55. https://sourceforge.net/projects/treegen/
  56. https://www.nseindia.com/get-quotes/equity?symbol=AURIONPRO
  57. https://m.indiacustomercare.com/rajcomp-info-services-ltd-risl-contact-no
  58. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/AURIONPRO.NS/
  59. https://www.moneycontrol.com/city/how-a-rajasthan-officer-s-wife-earned-rs-37-lakh-salary-for-jobs-she-never-did-article-13633454.html/amp
  60. https://www.sebi.gov.in/sebi_data/meetingfiles/1326177032722-a.pdf
  61. https://www.scribd.com/document/535425984/SCAM-CORRUPTION-2014-Indian-Social-Institute-PDFDrive
  62. https://business.bofa.com/content/dam/flagship/in/en/regulatory-legal-and-policy-documents/List-of-unclaimed-deposits-and-inoperative-accounts-for-more-than-10-years.pdf
  63. https://www.doi.gov/pmb
  64. https://api.sci.gov.in/jonew/cl/2025-02-28/M_J_1.pdf
  65. https://www.facebook.com/cnnnews18/posts/a-probe-found-that-pradyuman-dixit-a-joint-director-at-rajcomp-info-services-rec/1429696615866644/
  66. https://jharkhandhighcourt.nic.in/display_pdf/entire_causelist/DAILY_CAUSELIST_04042025.pdf
  67. https://www.linkedin.com/in/kamlesh2366
  68. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUg5FQZCPIg
  69. https://in.linkedin.com/in/rakesh-kumar-376114135
  70. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/ban-carbide-guns-after-rise-in-eye-injuries-say-experts/articleshow/124836937.cms
  71. https://www.linkedin.com/company/aurionpro-solutions
  72. https://www.sharekhan.com/stock/aurionpro-solutions-ltd
  73. https://www.softwaretenders.in/quicksearch.aspx?st=qs&SerCat=24&Text=State+Government&SerText=8&si=2
  74. https://eproc.rajasthan.gov.in/nicgep/app?page=FrontEndTendersByOrganisation&service=page
  75. https://www.constructionweekonline.in/business/aurionpro-bags-rajasthan-governments-prestigious-smart-city-initiative
  76. https://forum.valuepickr.com/t/aurion-pro-yet-another-ip-product-company/103941
  77. https://eproc.rajasthan.gov.in/nicgep/app?component=%24DirectLink&page=FrontEndAdvancedSearchResult&service=direct
  78. http://www.cmlinks.com/pub/dp/dp8040.pdf
  79. https://etenders.gov.in/eprocure/app?page=FrontEndTendersByOrganisation&service=page

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR