{"id":13801,"date":"2026-04-30T21:57:01","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T16:27:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/?p=13801"},"modified":"2026-04-04T10:37:26","modified_gmt":"2026-04-04T05:07:26","slug":"chapter-viii-of-the-uttar-pradesh-urban-planning-and-development-act-1973","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/chapter-viii-of-the-uttar-pradesh-urban-planning-and-development-act-1973\/","title":{"rendered":"Chapter VIII of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Chapter VIII of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Overview of the Act and Place of Chapter VIII<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 (UPUPDA)<\/strong> was enacted to ensure planned development of notified “development areas”<\/strong> through specialised Development Authorities on the model of the Delhi Development Authority<\/strong>. It lays down a complete code for preparation of master plans and zonal development plans, regulation of development, acquisition and disposal of land, and financial and administrative control of development authorities.[1][2][3][4]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Within this scheme, Chapter VIII<\/strong> titled \u201cSupplemental and Miscellaneous Provisions\u201d<\/strong> contains the principal enforcement, penalty, fiscal and procedural provisions that allow the Act to be effectively implemented. It provides the legal machinery for inspection, penal action against unauthorised development, demolition, stoppage and sealing of works, levy of betterment and other charges, recovery of dues, and procedural safeguards such as notice, service and protection of action taken in good faith.[3][4][5]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scheme and Sections of Chapter VIII<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Chapter VIII<\/strong> covers Sections 25 to 54<\/strong> and is headed \u201cSupplemental and Miscellaneous Provisions\u201d<\/strong>. The sections can be grouped broadly as inspection and offences, enforcement powers, financial and betterment provisions, recovery and control, and general procedural safeguards.[2][3]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Section<\/th>Marginal heading (shortened)<\/th>Core subject<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
25<\/td>Power of entry<\/td>Authorised entry into land\/buildings for survey, inspection, enforcement and allied purposes.[4]<\/td><\/tr>
26<\/td>Penalties<\/td>Penal consequences for unauthorised development and use of land\/buildings and for obstructing authorised entry.[4]<\/td><\/tr>
26\u2011A\u201326\u2011D<\/td>Encroachment and related offences<\/td>Creation, removal and non\u2011prevention of encroachments\/obstructions on public land and related compensation.[3][4]<\/td><\/tr>
27<\/td>Order of demolition of building<\/td>Demolition of works commenced or carried out contrary to plan or without\/contrary to permission.[3][6]<\/td><\/tr>
28<\/td>Power to stop development<\/td>Stop\u2011work directions where development is being carried on unauthorisedly or in breach of conditions.[3][7]<\/td><\/tr>
28\u2011A<\/td>Power to seal unauthorised development<\/td>Sealing of premises where unauthorised development is going on or has taken place.[3][8]<\/td><\/tr>
29<\/td>Conferment of other powers<\/td>Allocation of certain powers under other laws to the Authority for effective implementation.[3]<\/td><\/tr>
30<\/td>Offences by companies<\/td>Vicarious liability of persons in charge of a company for offences under the Act.[3]<\/td><\/tr>
31<\/td>Fines payable to Authority<\/td>Credit of fines realised under the Act to the Development Authority.[3]<\/td><\/tr>
32<\/td>Composition of offences<\/td>Power to compound specified offences on payment of composition money.[3]<\/td><\/tr>
33<\/td>Authority may provide amenity at cost of owner<\/td>Enforcement of amenities or development at owner\u2019s cost, including levy of cess for default.[2][3]<\/td><\/tr>
34<\/td>Local authority to assume responsibilities<\/td>Power to require a local authority to take over certain services or amenities provided by the Development Authority.[2][3]<\/td><\/tr>
35\u201338<\/td>Betterment charges<\/td>Levy, assessment, finality and payment of betterment charges on land whose value increases due to the Authority\u2019s schemes.[2][3]<\/td><\/tr>
38\u2011A<\/td>Land\u2011use conversion and development charge<\/td>Power to levy land\u2011use conversion charge and development\/city development charge.[2][9]<\/td><\/tr>
38\u2011B<\/td>Urban use charge<\/td>Power to levy an urban use charge on persons or bodies benefiting from authorised urban use.[1][2]<\/td><\/tr>
39<\/td>Additional stamp duty<\/td>Additional stamp duty on certain transfers in development areas, dedicated to the Authority.[2][3]<\/td><\/tr>
39\u2011A<\/td>Toll for amenities<\/td>Authority\u2019s power to levy tolls for specified amenities like roads or bridges.[2][3]<\/td><\/tr>
39\u2011B\u201339\u2011C<\/td>Licensing and licence fee<\/td>Licensing of private developers for assembly and development of land and levy of licence fee.[1][9]<\/td><\/tr>
40<\/td>Recovery of money due<\/td>Recovery of sums due to the Authority as arrears of land revenue or by other prescribed modes.[2][3]<\/td><\/tr>
41\u201342<\/td>Control and returns<\/td>State Government\u2019s control over the Authority and requirement of returns and inspections.[2]<\/td><\/tr>
43\u201345<\/td>Service and content of notices<\/td>Rules for service of notices and public notices and requirement of reasonable time in notices.[2][10]<\/td><\/tr>
46\u201347<\/td>Authentication and public servants<\/td>Authentication of orders\/documents and declaration of members\/officers as public servants.[2]<\/td><\/tr>
48\u201349<\/td>Jurisdiction and sanction<\/td>Bar on jurisdiction of civil courts and requirement of sanction for prosecution.[2][10]<\/td><\/tr>
50\u201354<\/td>Protection, delegation, savings<\/td>Protection for actions taken in good faith, delegation of powers, savings, exemptions and plan modifications.[2][3]<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This structure shows that Chapter VIII is both the enforcement backbone and the fiscal engine of the UPUPDA, tying together regulatory powers, penal provisions and financial tools.[2][3]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Power of Entry \u2013 Section 25<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Section 25<\/strong> authorises the Vice\u2011Chairman of the Development Authority to empower any person, with or without assistants or workmen, to enter into or upon any land or building for specified purposes connected with the administration of the Act. These purposes include conducting surveys and measurements, examining works under construction, determining the course of sewers and drains, digging or boring into the sub\u2011soil, and setting out boundaries and lines of proposed work.[4]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A key function of this provision is to allow officers to verify whether development is being or has been carried out in conformity with the master plan or zonal development plan and in accordance with permissions granted under Section 14 and 15<\/strong>. Section 25 expressly permits entry to ascertain whether works are unauthorised or in breach of the conditions of permission, thereby making it a crucial investigative tool preceding action under Sections 26, 27, 28 or 28\u2011A<\/strong>.[6][1][4]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The section, however, balances enforcement with privacy and social\u2011religious sensitivities. Entry must generally be between sunrise and sunset, reasonable notice is to be given to the occupier or, if there is none, to the owner, women must be afforded an opportunity to withdraw, and due regard is to be had to social and religious usages of the occupants. Obstruction of entry is itself made a distinct offence punishable under Section 26(3)<\/strong>, which reinforces the mandatory character of inspection powers.[11][4]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Penal Provisions for Unauthorised Development and Use \u2013 Section 26<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Section 26 is the primary penal clause for unauthorised development and misuse of land and buildings. Sub\u2011section (1)<\/strong> targets any person or body, including government departments, who undertakes or carries out development in contravention of the master or zonal plan, without the permission referred to in Section 14, or in violation of the conditions of such permission. For such contraventions, the present maximum fine extends to fifty thousand rupees, with an additional daily fine that may extend to two thousand five hundred rupees for every day the offence continues after the first conviction.[5][4]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sub\u2011section (2)<\/strong> addresses misuse of land and buildings by penalising use in contravention of Section 16 or contrary to terms and conditions prescribed under its proviso. The maximum fine for such misuse is twenty\u2011five thousand rupees, with a further fine that may extend to one thousand two hundred and fifty rupees per day for continuing contravention after conviction. These enhanced figures reflect amendments intended to make penalties economically significant in the context of modern land values.[9][1][4][2]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sub\u2011section (3)<\/strong> criminalises obstruction of authorised entry under Section 25 or molestation of the authorised person after entry. The punishment prescribed is imprisonment up to six months, or fine up to one thousand rupees, or both, signalling that physical obstruction of enforcement staff is treated more seriously than mere regulatory contravention. In practice, authorities often invoke Section 26 alongside demolition, stoppage or sealing powers to create both penal and coercive consequences for unauthorised development.[10][4][11][6]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Encroachment and Obstruction on Public Land \u2013 Sections 26\u2011A to 26\u2011D<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Sections 26\u2011A to 26\u2011D<\/strong>, inserted later, specifically address encroachments and obstructions on public land within development areas. Section 26\u2011A<\/strong> makes unauthorised encroachment on land that is not private property, whether or not it vests in the Authority, an offence punishable with simple imprisonment up to one year and fine up to twenty thousand rupees, and declares such offence cognisable. It also separately penalises obstruction of public streets or other non\u2011private land by depositing materials or other objects, reflecting the common problem of construction materials and commercial spill\u2011overs occupying public space.[3][4]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Section 26\u2011B<\/strong> provides a limited right to claim compensation for removal of encroachments made under Section 26\u2011A in specified situations, ensuring that bona fide occupiers or persons affected by over\u2011broad removal actions have a statutory remedy. Section 26\u2011C<\/strong> authorises the Authority to remove any erection or deposit made in contravention of the Act without notice in defined circumstances, underscoring the urgency often required in clearing public land. Section 26\u2011D<\/strong> creates liability for persons under an obligation to prevent encroachment, such as functionaries responsible for protecting Authority or public land, thereby attempting to curb connivance or negligence.[4][3]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Demolition, Stop\u2011Work and Sealing Powers \u2013 Sections 27, 28 and 28\u2011A<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Section 27 \u2013 Order of Demolition<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Section 27<\/strong> empowers the Vice\u2011Chairman to order demolition where development has been commenced, is being carried on, or has been completed in contravention of the master or zonal plan<\/strong>, without the required permission, or contrary to the conditions of permission. The provision generally requires issuance of notice specifying the grounds of proposed demolition and stipulating a time between a minimum of 15 and a maximum of 40 days<\/strong> within which the owner must demolish or alter the work to conform to law.[12][6][3]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the owner fails to comply, the Authority may itself demolish the structure and recover the cost from the person who undertook or allowed the unauthorised development, typically treating the amount as arrears of land revenue. Courts have emphasised that before demolition under Section 27, principles of natural justice must be scrupulously followed, including real and effective service of notice and reasonable opportunity of hearing. In a recent case on demolitions in Prayagraj, the Supreme Court described the Authority\u2019s action as “inhuman and illegal”<\/strong> and stressed that demolition under Section 27 must not violate the right to housing under Article 21.[13][14][6][10][4]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Section 28 \u2013 Power to Stop Development<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Section 28<\/strong> enables the Authority to issue stop\u2011work orders<\/strong> where development is being carried out without permission, contrary to plan, or in breach of conditions. Typically the Vice\u2011Chairman<\/strong> issues a notice directing immediate stoppage of development activities and warning of further action, including demolition and prosecution, in case of non\u2011compliance. This provision allows swift intervention at an early stage, often before the structure is completed, which is vital given the difficulty of reversing completed high\u2011value construction in dense urban areas.[7][15][10][3]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Judicial decisions have treated Section 28<\/strong> as a preventive measure, distinct from punitive demolition under Section 27<\/strong>, but subject to similar requirements of fair notice and an opportunity to respond, especially where stoppage has severe economic impact. In writ petitions challenging stop\u2011work notices, High Courts have generally declined to interfere at the threshold where the Authority can show prima facie violation of the Act or the plan, but have set aside orders where they were arbitrary or issued without jurisdiction.[15][7]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Section 28\u2011A \u2013 Sealing of Unauthorised Development<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Section 28\u2011A<\/strong> gives the Authority power to seal premises where unauthorised development has been carried out or is being continued, by ordering closure and physically sealing the building or part thereof. Sub\u2011section (4) provides a statutory appellate remedy against sealing orders, usually to the Chairman of the Development Authority, subject to prescribed conditions.[8][16][3]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Courts have read Section 28\u2011A<\/strong> in conjunction with Sections 27 and 28<\/strong>, holding that sealing is an adjunct to demolition or stoppage powers and that, as a rule, proceedings under Section 27 or 28 should be initiated before or alongside sealing. The Uttarakhand High Court<\/strong>, for example, set aside conditions in an order under Section 28\u2011A(4) and reiterated that sealing must be preceded by proper proceedings and cannot be used to bypass the statutory scheme of notice, hearing and compounding where available.[16][8]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ancillary Enforcement Powers and Corporate Liability \u2013 Sections 29 to 32<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Section 29<\/strong> allows conferment of additional powers on the Authority, including powers possessed by local bodies or other agencies, to avoid jurisdictional gaps in implementing development schemes. This can include powers under municipal or improvement trust statutes that are necessary for coordinated urban management, subject to State Government<\/strong> directions.[3][4]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Section 30<\/strong> deals with offences by companies and follows the general pattern of vicarious liability statutes, deeming persons who were in charge of and responsible to the company at the time of commission of an offence, as well as the company itself, to be guilty, subject to a “due diligence” <\/strong>defence. Additionally, directors, managers or officers whose consent, connivance or neglect led to the offence can be singled out for prosecution, which is important given the prevalence of corporate developers in urban land assembly and construction.[17][3]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Section 31<\/strong> directs that fines realised under the Act are to be credited to the funds of the Development Authority, reinforcing the financial capacity of authorities to undertake development and enforcement activities. Section 32 enables composition of specified offences on payment of prescribed sums, which allows for pragmatic resolution of minor or technical breaches without full criminal prosecution, and often operates alongside compounding schemes framed by the State Government.[10][2][3]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Amenities, Betterment and Fiscal Measures \u2013 Sections 33 to 39\u2011C<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Section 33<\/strong> empowers the Authority to provide prescribed amenities or carry out development where the owner or occupier defaults in doing so within time, and to recover the cost from such person, including by levying a cess in certain cases. This ensures that defaults by individual plot\u2011holders do not undermine the overall planned development or leave gaps in critical infrastructure such as roads, drains or street lighting.[18][2][4][3]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Section 34<\/strong> authorises the Authority to require a local authority to assume responsibility for maintenance of services and amenities once they have been developed to a specified standard, thereby enabling transition from project\u2011mode development to routine municipal administration. Sections 35 to 38 lay down the regime of betterment charges, whereby owners of land whose value has increased due to the implementation of the development plan can be made to contribute back a portion of that increase.[18][2][3]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Under these provisions, the Authority may assess betterment charge having regard to the increase in market value, issue notices, hear objections, and pass final orders which are largely immune from challenge except on limited grounds. Payment can be demanded as a lump sum or in instalments, and non\u2011payment attracts recovery as arrears of land revenue under Section 40<\/strong>, creating a robust fiscal tool to fund urban infrastructure without over\u2011reliance on general taxation.[2][3]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sections 38\u2011A and 38\u2011B<\/strong> reflect more recent policy shifts, expressly empowering the Authority to levy land\u2011use conversion charges<\/strong>, city development\/development charges<\/strong> and urban use charges<\/strong> in notified circumstances. These charges apply, for example, where agricultural land is converted to urban uses under a master or zonal plan, or where large developments require enhanced infrastructure, and they provide a direct financial linkage between the beneficiaries of development and the costs of providing urban amenities.[19][1][9]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sections 39, 39\u2011A, 39\u2011B and 39\u2011C<\/strong> supplement this fiscal framework by enabling imposition of additional stamp duty on certain transfers of property in development areas, levy of tolls for specific amenities, licensing of private developers for assembly and development of land and levy of licence fees. Together these provisions reflect a shift towards user\u2011charge and beneficiary\u2011pay principles, as well as regulation of private real\u2011estate players through licensing.[9][18][2]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Recovery, Control and Procedural Safeguards \u2013 Sections 40 to 45<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Section 40<\/strong> provides that all moneys due to the Authority under the Act, including charges, fees, betterment charges, cost of demolition or amenities and penalties, are recoverable as arrears of land revenue, unless otherwise provided. This gives the Authority access to the coercive machinery of revenue recovery, which is far more effective than ordinary civil suits for recovery of dues.[2][3]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Section 41<\/strong> vests the State Government with general control over the Authority, including the power to call for records, issue directions and require reports, ensuring that Chapter VIII powers are exercised in line with broader state policy and constitutional norms. Section 42 requires returns and inspections, enabling regular monitoring of the Authority\u2019s functioning and finances.[20][2]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sections 43 to 45<\/strong> lay down rules for service and content of notices and for public notices. They clarify modes such as personal service, registered post, affixture, and publication, and mandate that notices should specify a reasonable time for compliance, failing which coercive action may be challenged as arbitrary. Recent Supreme Court scrutiny of demolition actions under Section 27<\/strong> has relied heavily on whether notices were genuinely served in accordance with Section 43<\/strong> and whether sufficient time was afforded, linking these procedural safeguards in Chapter VIII with fundamental rights jurisprudence.[14][13][4][10][2]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

General Protections, Delegation and Savings \u2013 Sections 46 to 54<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Section 46<\/strong> deals with authentication of orders and documents of the Authority, ordinarily requiring signature or authentication by prescribed officers, which helps courts and affected persons verify the legality of actions taken under Chapter VIII. Section 47<\/strong> declares members, officers and servants of the Authority to be public servants, bringing them within the purview of the Indian Penal Code\u2019s provisions on public servants and related offences.[4][2]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Section 48<\/strong> restricts the jurisdiction of civil courts in respect of matters that the Act entrusts exclusively to the Authority or to designated appellate bodies, thereby preventing parallel litigation from obstructing planned development, though constitutional remedies under Articles 226 and 32<\/strong> remain untouched. Section 49<\/strong> requires previous sanction of the Authority or State Government (as specified) for prosecutions under the Act, which acts as a filter against frivolous or excessive criminal proceedings.[10][2]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sections 50 to 54<\/strong> complete the chapter with protection of action taken in good faith, power of delegation of functions by the Authority, savings for certain actions or properties, exemptions for specified areas or undertakings, and provisions deeming plans to stand modified in identified circumstances. These provisions are typical of modern planning and development legislation and are intended to provide stability and flexibility in implementation while preserving accountability.[19][18][3][2]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Judicial Trends and Practical Implications of Chapter VIII<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Recent case\u2011law shows that the most litigated provisions of Chapter VIII<\/strong> are Sections 25, 26, 27, 28 and 28\u2011A<\/strong>, reflecting the tension between strong enforcement against unauthorised development and protection of property and housing rights. High Courts have repeatedly stressed that before exercising powers of entry, demolition, stoppage or sealing, authorities must scrupulously follow the procedural requirements in Chapter VIII, including proper service of notice, recording of reasons and observance of natural justice.[6][8][13][16]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the Prayagraj demolition matters, the Supreme Court<\/strong> noted that the Authority acted under Section 27 but failed to afford adequate time or effective opportunity to respond and held the demolitions to be a violation of Article 21, awarding compensation and directing strict adherence to statutory safeguards. Similarly, in challenges to sealing orders, High Courts<\/strong> have emphasised that Section 28\u2011A cannot be used in isolation and must ordinarily be preceded by, or at least accompanied with, proceedings under Sections 27 or 28 so that affected persons can avail of compounding or regularisation avenues where law permits.[8][13][16][14]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From a practitioner\u2019s perspective, Chapter VIII requires careful cross\u2011reading with the master plan, zonal development plan and permissions under Sections 14 and 15, since most enforcement hinges on proving deviation from these instruments. At the same time, development authorities must design by\u2011laws and compounding policies that harmonise the deterrent effect of penalties and demolition with realistic pathways for compliance and regularisation, keeping in view constitutional standards and judicial scrutiny.[5][19][18][10]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. the uttar pradesh urban planning and development act, …<\/a> – CHAPTER VIII. Supplemental and Miscellaneous Provisions. Power of entry 25 … [The Uttar Pradesh Ur…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning & Development Act,- 1973<\/a> – Contains all Enforced Central and State Acts linked with Subordinate Data like Rules,Regulations,Not…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. THE UTTAR PRADESH URBAN PLANNING AND …<\/a> – Section 26-A has taken place shall be the … The old Section 40, U.P. Urban Planning and Developmen…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Awas Acts : APPENDIX-8 THE UTTAR PRADESH URBAN …<\/a> – (3) Any person who obstructs the entry of a person authorised under Section 25 … The old Section 4…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning & Development Act, 1973 Overview …<\/a> – : Athe uttar pradesh urban planning and development act, 1973. Uploaded … CHAPTER VIII. (Supplemen…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  6. Understanding Legal Remedies After Demolition Notices | Blog<\/a> – Discover legal avenues for property owners facing demolition notices in Indian states, ensuring fair…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  7. Smt. Bimla Devi And Another v. Allahabad Development …<\/a> – This notice was under Section 28 of the U.P Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. The petitioner…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  8. Shadma Siddiqui And Another … vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others<\/a> – , 2025 Latest Caselaw 5718 UK<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  9. Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning And Development …<\/a> – AN ORDINANCE further to amend the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. WHEREAS, t…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  10. UP Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973<\/a> – UP Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. The Supreme Court has … Section 28 \u2013 Power to Stop Un…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  11. Section 26(3) in U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act …<\/a> – Section 26(3) in U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. (3)Any person who obstructs the entr…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  12. Section 27 in U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973<\/a> – Section 27 in U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. 27. Order of demolition of building. (1…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  13. Shocks our conscience: SC slams UP authority over illegal demolitions<\/a> – The Bench pointed out that the demolition was carried out by the authority under Section 27 of the U…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  14. \u201cThere is something called Article 21,\u201d SC slams UP Govt<\/a> – … demolition, the Live Law reported. The petitioners argued that … Section 27(2) of the UP Urban…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  15. WRIT – C No. 37323 of 2014 at Allahabad Dated-22.7. …<\/a> – A notice dated 5.5.2014 was received by the petitioner under Section 28 (1) of the U.P. Urban Planni…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  16. Allahabad High Court sets aside Meerut Development …<\/a> – The Allahabad High Court while allowing the petition observed that if any order is to be passed unde…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  17. M\/S Hindustan Constr… v. State Of U.P. Thru. .. …<\/a> – Get free access to the complete judgment in M\/S Hindustan Constr… v. State Of U.P. Thru. … on Ca…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  18. Model Building Construction and Development Byelaws …<\/a> – the UP Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 for development of … As per Section 26 of Uttar Pr…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  19. Land Acquisition: Insights Into Uttar Pradesh’s Urban Planning And …<\/a> – The petitioner argued that the charges were not covered under relevant sections of the U.P. Urban Pl…<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  20. The Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development ( …<\/a> – The Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 (President’s Act No. 11 of 1973) is enact…<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Chapter VIII of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 Overview of the Act and Place of Chapter VIII The Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 (UPUPDA) was enacted to ensure planned development of notified “development areas” through specialised Development Authorities on the model of the Delhi Development Authority. It lays […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":35,"featured_media":13810,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13801","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bachelor-laws"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13801","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/35"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13801"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13801\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13821,"href":"https:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13801\/revisions\/13821"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13810"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13801"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13801"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13801"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}