{"id":3100,"date":"2017-10-28T09:15:39","date_gmt":"2017-10-28T03:45:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/?p=3100"},"modified":"2017-10-27T09:52:14","modified_gmt":"2017-10-27T04:22:14","slug":"sentence-rearrangement-form-meaningful-paragraph-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infipark.com\/articles\/sentence-rearrangement-form-meaningful-paragraph-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence Rearrangement to Form a Meaningful Paragraph – 4"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rearrange the following six sentences (A), (B), (C), (D), (E) and (F) in the proper sequence to form a meaningful paragraph, then answer the given question.<\/strong> [IBPS RRB 2015]<\/p>\n

(A) So while these partnerships are at times messy and controversial, on balance, they are a force for good.<\/p>\n

(B) NGOs help companies reach and meet the needs of parts of the market that companies do not understand such as the marginalised, where NGOs have unique insight<\/p>\n

(C) But before concluding that such partnership are valueless it is worth recalling the reasons why they took off in the first place.<\/p>\n

(D) For NGOs too, partnerships with firms have their uses, with companies providing money and ways of influencing the minds and behaviour of million of people.<\/p>\n

(E) There are many opponents to the close ties between companies and charities Non-governmental Organisations (NGOs).<\/p>\n

(F) NGOs are also better than companies at attracting and retaining idealistic talent, who sometimes end up even being absorbed by the companies to administer the policies they worked for NGOs.<\/p>\n