Explain the different modes of termination of agency. In what manner and circumstances can agency be revoked ? Or When does a contract of agency comes to an end ?
Agency is the legal relationship whereby one person, called the agent, is authorised to act on behalf of another, called the principal, so as to create, modify or affect legal relations with third parties. Once created, this relationship does not subsist forever; it may come to an end in various ways recognised by the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (ICA), particularly in Sections 201 to 210. This report explains the different modes of termination of agency, the manner and circumstances in which agency may be revoked, and when a contract of agency comes to an end under Indian law.[1][2][^3]
Statutory Framework (Sections 201–210)
Sections 182–238 of the ICA deal with agency in general, and Sections 201–210 specifically govern termination of agency and its consequences.[2][3]
- Section 201: General provision on termination of agency.
- Sections 202–204: Special rules on agency coupled with interest and limits on revocation.
- Sections 205–207: Compensation and notice on premature revocation or renunciation; express and implied revocation.
- Section 208: When termination becomes effective as to the agent and third persons.
- Section 209: Agent’s duty on termination by death or insanity of the principal.
- Section 210: Termination of sub‑agent’s authority.
Section 201 lays down the principal modes and circumstances in which agency terminates, and the later sections refine and qualify these general rules.[4][1]
Meaning of Termination of Agency
Termination of agency means putting an end to the legal relationship of principal and agent so that the agent ceases to have authority to bind the principal in dealings with third parties. After valid termination, any act of the former agent does not bind the principal, subject to certain protections for third parties who act in good faith without notice of termination.[5][1][2][4]
General Modes of Termination under Section 201
Section 201 of the ICA provides that an agency is terminated:
- By the principal revoking his authority.
- By the agent renouncing the business of the agency.
- By the business of the agency being completed.
- By either the principal or agent dying or becoming of unsound mind.
- By the principal being adjudicated an insolvent.[6][1][^5]
On the basis of this, termination is usually classified into two broad groups:
- Termination by act of the parties.
- Termination by operation of law.[3][4]
Termination by Act of the Parties
1. Termination by Mutual Agreement
Like any other contract, a contract of agency may come to an end by mutual agreement between the principal and the agent. They may agree expressly to cancel the agency, or their conduct may imply that both treat the agency as ended (for example, by substituting a new arrangement inconsistent with the earlier agency).[2][4]
2. Revocation by the Principal (Sections 201, 203, 204, 207, 208)
The principal is generally entitled to revoke the authority of his agent at any time before the authority has been exercised so as to bind the principal, subject to statutory limits.[1][3]
(a) Basic rule of revocation (Section 203)
Section 203 states that the principal may revoke the authority given to his agent at any time before the authority has been exercised so as to bind the principal. Once the agent has exercised his authority and thereby bound the principal, the principal cannot undo that binding effect merely by revoking authority.[7][8]
(b) Partial exercise of authority (Section 204)
Section 204 provides that when the agent has partly exercised the authority, the principal cannot revoke it so far as regards acts and obligations that arise from acts already done in the agency. Thus, revocation is prospective; it cannot affect rights and obligations that have already arisen.[3][4]
(c) Express or implied revocation (Section 207)
Under Section 207, revocation may be express or implied in the conduct of the principal. For example, if A authorises B to let A’s house, and afterwards A himself lets the house, this amounts to implied revocation of B’s authority.[5][4][^1]
(d) When revocation becomes effective (Section 208)
Section 208 lays down that the termination of the agent’s authority does not, so far as regards the agent, take effect before it becomes known to him, or, so far as regards third persons, before it becomes known to them. This protects both the agent and third parties who act in good faith without knowledge of the revocation.[4][1]
3. Renunciation by the Agent (Sections 201, 206, 207)
Just as the principal can revoke the authority, the agent can also renounce the business of the agency. Section 206 provides that reasonable notice of such renunciation must be given by the agent to the principal, failing which the agent will be liable to compensate the principal for any resulting loss.[8][9][6][3]
Renunciation, like revocation, may be express or implied under Section 207. For instance, if an agent consistently refuses to act and clearly conducts himself in a manner inconsistent with continuing the agency, renunciation may be inferred.[1][5]
4. Completion of the Business of Agency
Where the agency is created for the performance of a particular work or transaction, the authority of the agent terminates automatically on completion of that business. For example, when an agent is appointed to sell a specific car and the car is duly sold, the agency comes to an end.[9][6]
5. Expiry of Time (Implied from Sections 201, 205)
When an agency is created for a fixed period, it terminates on expiry of that period, even if the work remains incomplete, unless the parties agree otherwise. Section 205 recognises that if the principal revokes an agency created for a fixed period before the expiry of that period without sufficient cause, he is liable to compensate the agent for any resulting loss.[8][9][2][4]
Termination by Operation of Law
Apart from acts of the parties, certain events automatically bring the agency to an end by operation of law.
1. Death of Principal or Agent
Under Section 201, the agency terminates by death of either the principal or the agent. Section 209 further provides that when the agency is terminated by the principal’s death or insanity, the agent must, so far as possible, take on behalf of the representatives of his late principal all reasonable steps for the protection and preservation of the interests entrusted to him.[6][4][^1]
2. Unsoundness of Mind of Principal or Agent
If either the principal or the agent becomes of unsound mind, the agency stands terminated under Section 201. This is because a person of unsound mind cannot validly consent, and the continuous consent required for agency is thereby destroyed.[6][2][^1]
3. Insolvency of the Principal
Section 201 also provides that agency is terminated by the principal being adjudicated an insolvent under any law for the relief of insolvent debtors. Insolvency affects the principal’s capacity to contract and deal with his property, so the authority earlier given to the agent naturally comes to an end.[5][2][^1]
4. Destruction of Subject Matter or Frustration of Object
Where the subject matter of the agency is destroyed, or the business for which the agency was created becomes impossible or unlawful, the agency terminates by operation of law. For example, if an agent is appointed to sell a particular ship and the ship is destroyed, the agency ends automatically.[2][3]
5. Dissolution of Company or Principal Corporation
Where the principal is a company or corporation, its dissolution brings the agency to an end, just as the death of a natural person does. Similarly, if the agent is a company that is wound up, its capacity to act ceases, terminating the agency.[3][2]
6. Principal and Agent Becoming Alien Enemies
If, due to outbreak of war, the principal and agent become alien enemies, the agency terminates by operation of law in order to prevent dealings that may be prejudicial to the interests of the state. Contracts with an enemy are generally void or suspended, and the agency relationship cannot continue in such circumstances.[2][3]
Agency Coupled with Interest and Irrevocability (Section 202)
Concept of Agency Coupled with Interest
Section 202 provides that where the agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject matter of the agency, the agency cannot, in the absence of an express contract, be terminated to the prejudice of such interest. Such an agency is commonly described as an “agency coupled with interest” and is generally irrevocable.[7][1]
In Smart v. Sandars, an English decision often cited in Indian texts, it was observed that where an agreement is entered into on sufficient consideration and authority is given for the purpose of securing some benefit to the donee of the authority, such authority is irrevocable.[^8]
Effect of Section 202
If the conditions of Section 202 are satisfied, the principal cannot revoke the authority of the agent to the prejudice of the agent’s interest, nor can the agency be terminated by the death, insanity or insolvency of the principal, unless otherwise agreed. Courts in India have applied this principle particularly to certain kinds of powers of attorney granted as security for a loan or as part of a larger transaction where the agent (e.g., a developer or attorney‑holder) has a beneficial interest in the subject matter.[10][11][^7]
However, merely describing an agency as “irrevocable” is not enough; there must be a real, subsisting interest of the agent in the subject matter of the agency, existing at the time of creation of the agency.[11][8]
Rules Relating to Revocation and Renunciation (Sections 203–207)
1. Limitation on Revocation after Exercise of Authority (Section 204)
Where the authority has been partly exercised by the agent, the principal cannot revoke it so far as regards acts and obligations that arise from acts already done. The principal remains bound by transactions already entered into by the agent within the scope of authority before revocation.[4][3]
2. Compensation for Premature Revocation or Renunciation (Section 205)
If an agency has been created for a fixed period, premature revocation by the principal without sufficient cause entitles the agent to compensation for loss suffered. Conversely, if the agent renounces the agency before the expiry of the fixed period without sufficient cause, the principal is entitled to compensation.[9][8]
3. Reasonable Notice (Section 206)
Section 206 requires that reasonable notice of revocation or renunciation must be given, otherwise the party in default must make good the resulting damage. What is “reasonable” depends on the nature of the agency, the duration of the relationship and the surrounding circumstances.[9][8][3][2]
4. Express and Implied Modes (Section 207)
Section 207 clarifies that revocation or renunciation may be either express or implied from the conduct of the principal or agent. Acts inconsistent with continuance of the agency (such as the principal personally doing the act for which the agent was appointed, or appointing another agent in place of the existing one) may amount to implied revocation.[1][5][^4]
5. Effective Date of Termination (Section 208)
Under Section 208, termination of the agent’s authority takes effect, as between the principal and agent, when it becomes known to the agent, and, as regards third persons, when it becomes known to them. Thus, even after internal revocation, the principal may be bound towards third parties who deal in good faith with the agent without knowledge of termination.[4][1]
Effect of Termination on Sub‑agents (Section 210)
Section 210 states that the termination of an agent’s authority also terminates the authority of all sub‑agents appointed by him. Since a sub‑agent derives authority through the agent, extinguishing the superior authority automatically ends the subordinate authority as well.[1][4]
Duties of Agent on Termination by Death or Insanity of Principal (Section 209)
When the agency terminates by the death or insanity of the principal, the agent is under a duty, so far as possible, to take all reasonable steps for the protection and preservation of the interests entrusted to him on behalf of the principal’s legal representatives. This obligation prevents sudden prejudice to the principal’s estate due to abrupt termination of the relationship.[4][1]
When Does a Contract of Agency Come to an End? – Synthesis
From the above provisions, a contract of agency comes to an end in the following main situations:
- By agreement of the parties (express cancellation or implied by conduct).
- By revocation of authority by the principal, subject to limits in Sections 202 and 204, and subject to notice under Sections 206–208.[3][1]
- By renunciation of the agency by the agent, with reasonable notice and liability for premature renunciation under Sections 205–206.[6][9]
- By completion of the business for which the agency was created.
- By expiry of the period for which the agency was constituted.
- By death, insanity or insolvency of the principal, and by death or insanity of the agent.[6][1]
- By destruction of the subject matter or frustration or illegality of the object.
- By dissolution of a company or corporation acting as principal or agent.
- By principal and agent becoming alien enemies due to outbreak of war.[2][3]
An important exception is an agency coupled with interest under Section 202, which is generally not terminable to the prejudice of the agent’s interest and may survive even the death or insolvency of the principal. In all other cases, once valid termination occurs and is duly communicated, the agent loses authority to bind the principal, and any subsequent acts do not affect the principal’s legal position vis‑à‑vis third parties.[10][11][^7]
References
- Section 201 – The Indian Contract Act, 1872 – An agency is terminated by the principal revoking his authority; or by the agent renouncing the busi…
- Termination of Agency under Indian Contract Act, 1872 – Sections 201 to 210 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 primarily deal with termination of agency. Thes…
- Understanding Agency and Its Termination – Learn the concept and termination of agency under the Indian Contract Act, 1872—modes, legal effects…
- Termination of Agency (S.201 to 210) – 201 provides that: An agency is terminated by the Principal revoking his authority or a by the agent…
- 898763_1601745537.docx
- Law of Contract and Specific Relief – Chapter X- Agency
- Termination of Agency Section 201 and 202 – Section 201 of ICA, 1872 states that an agency relationship is terminated by the principal’s death o…
- All you need to know about the agent-principal relationship – Section 202 to 210 provides various rules for termination of agency: According to Section 202, when …
- All you need to know about termination of an agency … – An Agency Arrangement is defined on the basis of a legal relationship between the Principal and the …
- indian+contract+act,1872+section+202 | Indian Case Law – The principles regarding Agency coupled with interest and its revocation are governed by Sections 20…
- Validity of Sale under Irrevocable Power of Attorney … – Section 202, Indian Contract Act: When an agency is coupled with interest, it is irrevocable even on…
