27. Discuss the accountability measures for stakeholders under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015.
Accountability of Police Officers: Section 107 holds police officers accountable for following child-friendly procedures.
Monitoring of CWCs and JJBs: CWCs and Juvenile Justice Boards are monitored by District Magistrates for effective functioning.
Responsibility of State Government: The State Government is responsible for ensuring proper implementation of the Act through rules and guidelines.
Registration of Child Care Institutions: Child care institutions must register and comply with standards under Section 41.
Penalties for Non-Compliance: Non-compliance by institutions is penalized under Section 42, including fines and closures.
Accountability of Probation Officers: Probation officers are accountable for conducting thorough social investigations and follow-ups.
Adherence to CARA Guidelines: Adoption agencies must adhere to CARA guidelines, or their registration can be suspended under Section 73.
Role of District Child Protection Units: District Child Protection Units oversee local implementation and are responsible for reporting to the State Government.
Regular Inspections: Regular inspections of child care institutions ensure adherence to quality and safety standards.
Financial Audits and Penalties: Funding misuse or mismanagement by institutions leads to financial audits and penalties.
Collaboration Among Stakeholders: The Act mandates collaboration among police, CWCs, and NGOs for child rescue and rehabilitation, with strict reporting obligations.
Transparency Through Reports: Transparency is ensured through regular reports submitted to higher authorities for review.
Case Law – Sheela Barse v. Union of India (1986): Emphasized the accountability of institutions and officials in protecting children’s rights.
